- home | about us | membership | council | other STAs | CONSTAT | ASTA | professional learning
 -  National Science Week | Tasmanian Science Talent Search | publications | awards
 | useful links -
 

Judges Comments ~ Technology Challenge ~ 2006

Congratulations to all teachers who persevered with this challenge through to completion. I know many schools had an “in-house” judging, with maybe only the best going to public judging, but regardless, all entrants seem to have learned a great deal about forces, friction, aerodynamics, and Newton’s 3 Laws of Motion.

 For future similar events, may I offer a few comments?

After introducing the challenge to be attempted, it is very important to brainstorm with your students the main underlying scientific concepts. Some students may already know some of the concepts, and you may choose to do a concurrent theoretical study of these topics, or encourage the students to research these themselves.

For example:   Forces/ pushes and pulls

                    Friction, how we can reduce this, lubrication, bearings etc.

                    Wind resistance, aerodynamics, shapes of fast-moving vehicles

                    Weight

Then ensure you note any restrictions in the Challenge, e.g. fan must be mounted on the vehicle. Please feel free to email me with any uncertainties or concerns (or better still, get the students to do this).  TSTS is run to assist teachers, so we are willing to give hints, ideas etc! This is all fair and above board!

This is a “Design, evaluate, modify” exercise.

It was good to read in students’ journals  that e.g. “We changed the body from say wood to polystyrene to make it lighter and it went better”  BUT SCIENTISTS ALWAYS TRY TO BE QUANTITATIVE ABOUT TESTING  AND GATHER EVIDENCE FOR THEIR DECISIONS!

I was very disappointed that only TWO students drew up a table of results to record variations and subsequent times or distances measured. This is an essential basis of scientific written work and even the youngest students can be shown how to write their results in a table/ chart, and to do multiple tests and perhaps record averages.

To prompt further improvements, ask questions like:

“How can we make it go faster?”

Make it lighter!”

“OK. So, how heavy is it now? (Weigh it!!). How can we reduce the weight? If you cut off bits of the front so it is more pointed and aerodynamic, re-weigh it! How much faster does it go now?”

What other ways could you reduce weight?  Thinner, smaller, hollow, different material, uplift….

At the end of the Launceston judging one of the teachers arrived bearing a Uni of Tas helium filled balloon. Fooling around, we tied a helium balloon above one of the vehicles. It certainly reduced the weight and friction, and the vehicle then “hooned” along! A bonus find, but obvious when considered. The rules for 2006 wouldn’t have exempted such reduction of weight. Think “outside the square!”

Keep encouraging alternative solutions.

Creativity and decorations are fun, but make sure they don’t compromise the performance of the vehicle.

Also, reduce air resistance. Consider shape of other fast-moving things….jet planes, racing cars, fish…they should be low, flat, pointy or with a diverter or “spoiler”.

Consider the science of wheels, axles and bearings… small area of contact with the ground (CD’s were good, being very smooth and light)

For each modification they should record the change and write down the results of re-trialling.

Journals:

Some teachers gave their students a journal outline with leading questions to get them to consider their procedure, the results, possible areas of weakness which could be improved .

THIS IS NOT CHEATING.  IT IS EXCELLENT TEACHING! Children learn by modelling from good examples . Young children in particular cannot be expected to know how to keep a scientific journal and how to write step-by-step procedures (method). This is a learned technique, and hence WE must help them learn it.

Some schools enlisted the help of Technology teachers to encourage students with the actual construction, but the science staff must take responsibility for covering the scientific concepts. After all, TSTS is not just another competition; it is an opportunity for learning and practising new science. You can probably only justify it as part of your curriculum time if children are achieving new learning and outcomes. Students are most receptive to new learning when there is a very real, immediate and practical application for it. How many little “Issac Newtons” are now full-bottle on the Laws of Motion and action/reaction forces.?

Use opportunities such as TSTS to feed them all the new science that will help them in their endeavours.  If you’re not sure about some of the concepts, enlist other specialist teachers, parents, or email me. Together our job is to inspire these kids.

I’m looking forward to receiving many Research projects. There are many ideas on our website.

But please encourage lots of recording of results, and discussions of unexpected results. Also include diagrams and photos. Digital cameras have made recording of some experiments a breeze.

Students do not have to “split atoms” to win a prize in TSTS.  It is very rare to receive a project of truly new science (but not unheard of!), but it may be new to most students! They simply need to show a scientific approach to an experimental situation.

Remember: I am here to help you, and happy to answer your queries by email.

Good luck,

Margaret Hosford

Director TSTS 2006.